Outdoor Cats are a Problem
Outdoor cats are a contentious issue for cat-owners, cat-lovers, and those that are concerned about the environment. Like it or not, Fluffy is doing a LOT of damage (Image credit: Cat Outside in Sweden-148884.jpg by Jonatan Svensson Glad, CC BY-SA 4.0, Image Cropped).
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but domestic cats are bad for the environment. Sure, we as a species have adopted and incorporated them into our society (I live with two, myself), but that doesn’t mean we aren’t responsible for them and their actions.
The other week I saw a tweet from a cat owner saying that their domestic outdoor cats weren’t a problem for native birds and other wildlife, but feral cats and pesticides were the true killers. Thankfully Dr. Holly Jones (@DocHPJones) responded to the tweet with some hard facts and scientific evidence for why domestic cats are an issue, and just how much damage they can really do. Not surprisingly, her tweet was met with lots of resistance from cat owners and cat lovers alike, stating that it’s “natural to let them hunt” and “they aren’t that big of a problem”. The unfortunate thing its that, like it or not, cats ARE that big of a problem.
Cats and the Environment
We’re all familiar with cats, and those of you that own/know people that own them know that there are two kinds, indoor cats and outdoor cats. Indoor cats are exactly what they sound like, pampered fluffballs that lounge around the house, waiting for their servants (humans) to feed them again (if I had a nickel for every time my cat begged for food I’d be a VERY wealthy man). Outdoor cats, on the other hand, are where things get problematic. These cats are responsible for the deaths of BILLIONS of birds and other wildlife the world over.
One of the big issues is that cats occur in very high densities as a result of their roles as pets for humans. Because we feed them and take them with us, these cats occur at higher densities than predators normally could in nature, as they are not reliant on a local prey population to sustain them. Consequently, native wildlife is vulnerable to many more predators than they normally would be. For example, a given habitat may normally support a small population of top predators, let’s say two or three cats. But, because they are fed by their humans and no longer have to compete with other cats, that same habitat is now “supporting” 20+ cats, which makes a huge difference for the local animals. Then, instead of a prey population being managed by a normal amount of top predators, the prey are completely wiped out by the larger than normal predator population.
Cats are obligate carnivores, and as such they have to eat meat. We feed them of course, so you may think that might prevent them from killing quite as much wildlife, but the thing about cats is that they are also notorious for killing animals and not eating them. If you own/have owned a cat, you have more than likely received an “offering” from your cat at one time or another. These spurious killings seem to be the cats way of showing off how good of a hunter they are, or perhaps ways to keep their skills sharp. Whatever it is, these offerings translate to additional (and unnecessary) mortality of local wildlife. Cat owners may use these offerings to estimate how many animals their cat kills, but they are not a good way to estimate the damage a cat does, as cats don’t always bring these kills home. In a study of farms in Poland, researchers estimated that, across all of the farms in the country, cats killed and brought home an average of 48 million mammals and 9 million birds per year, but killed (and didn’t bring home) an additional 583 million mammals and 137 million birds.
In one very extreme example, Lyall’s wren (Traversia lyalli) was once found throughout New Zealand, but its range was eventually restricted to Stephens Island in Cooks Strait. The common (and incorrect) story is that the species hunted to extinction by a single cat, the lighthouse keeper’s cat Tibbles. Tibbles certainly did plenty of damage himself, but other cats, feral or otherwise, helped him and contributed to the extinction of this bird.
Cat Owners and Their Responsibilities
By letting your cat roam free, you are contributing to the destruction of local environments and the native community of wildlife. I know it sounds harsh, and the cat lovers will be up in arms (not MY cat, surely. I only let them out every now and then….). It doesn’t matter. Cats are not only detrimental and destructive, this study has shown that cat owners themselves are part of the problem. By being either willfully ignorant of the actions of their feline companions or resistant to any action to limit their impact outside of neutering them (or some combination of both), cat owners that allow their pets outside are contributing to the problems that cats pose.
Additionally, it is the responsibility of cat owners to take heed of peer-reviewed scientific evidence. Misinformation is when people put forward information that goes directly against an overwhelming scientific consensus (look no further than climate change deniers and anti-vaxxers), but this is also an issue with cats. Cat advocates are known to spread misinformation about the damage that cats can do, and will actually seek to discredit the scientific evidence on the impact that cats have. For more information read this paper from Biological Invasions covering the events.
Take Home Message
Cats are bad for local wildlife. Period. If you own a cat, it is your responsibility to not only take care of them (and love them, of course), but to think of their impact on the environment and what you can do to limit that.
Also, indoor cats are healthier! They live longer, are less likely to be eaten by a predator themselves, they won’t get hit by a car, and they aren’t exposed to parasites. By keeping your feline friends indoors, you will give them AND the local wildlife better lives.
And An Added Bonus…
If you’ve stuck around for this long and would like to hear more about the lives of outdoor cats, consider tuning in to the latest episode of the podcast that my fellow EcoMass editor Sam Perrin and I run, Cinematica Animalia. It deals with last year’s “hit musical” Cats, and some of the facets of outdoor cat biology that are on display during the “film”.
Cinematica Animalia · S3E12- Cat-Ass-Trophe (Cats)
Adam Hasik is an evolutionary ecologist interested in the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of host-parasite interactions. You can read more about his research and his work for Ecology for the Masses here, see his personal website here, or follow him on Twitter here.
Good points, all the way around – I still have a differing opinion, though. Your opinion is not THE definitive and correct one for this argument.
Other “experts” will claim otherwise.
Thanks for the feedback, Dave! I have to stress though that this is not an opinion, but the summation of scientific evidence on the issue. Like climate change, there is overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the argument that outdoor cats are a problem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: How You Can Help Out Ecology for the Masses | Ecology for the Masses
Pingback: Science in Practice: Highlights from the Ecological Society of Australia’s 2019 Annual Meeting | Ecology for the Masses
Pingback: It’s a Matter of Scale | Ecology for the Masses
Pingback: Here Kitty: Our Love-Hate Relationship With Feral Cats | Ecology for the Masses
Pingback: Are You One of These Five Types of Cat Owners?
Pingback: Cats – My Happy Place
Outdoor cats won’t be a problem of we humans give them food to eat so they can’t hunt anymore. Let us open our backyard for them, give them food and water. If we do no that birds won’t be endangered. Outdoor cats have the rights to live.
Thanks for the feedback, Aileen. I’m not sure if you read the article itself, but as I touched on in the post the issue isn’t them being hungry or not, it’s their nature as cats. Hungry or satisfied, cats still hunt and kill birds and small mammals. Feeding isn’t the issue, outdoor cats are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Someone didn’t read the article and doesn’t know that cats hunt for pleasure, not just hunger. It’s called a prey drive. Ever see an indoor-only cat “hunt” a fly or a moth? Ever see those toys that have a feather or bell on the end of a string that is attached to a stick? Ever dangle a piece of yarn or string and watch the cat “play” with it? They aren’t “playing,” they are hunting. Sudden movement/noise triggers their prey drive and puts them into hunting mode. So even when well-fed, cats will hunt anything that triggers their innate prey drive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Even More Evil Birds, World-Destroying Cats and More Ecological Mysteries From The Search Terms | Ecology for the Masses
Pingback: Are Wind Farms A Threat To The Planet’s Birdlife? | Ecology for the Masses
I’ve got two cats I’ve kept outside and actually just threw a dead bird they’d left me at the door into the trash. They trigger my anxiety in the house so that’s not happening. No one wants them, so rehoming isn’t happening either. Am I to just kill them so they don’t kill other critters? The first I rescued and nursed by hand to be alive, the second was just a cat someone else didn’t want and I thought ‘play mate’ — Having cats again has assured me I’m not a fan. I’ll feed and care for them because I’m not heartless, but I also recognize the reality that I’m not going to have them in my house destroying things and making me paranoid.
A cat eradication effort on Amsterdam Island in the Indian Ocean found that killing all the cats resulted in a spike in the rat and mouse population, which then preyed on the bird population. Another cat eradication effort on Macquarie Island in the Pacific Ocean saw the rabbit population spike wildly once the cats were gone. Without cats to keep the rabbits in check, local vegetation was devastated by a rabbit feeding frenzy, and other animal species were then threatened by the loss of food and habitat.
Killing cats will not save wildlife. Studies have shown cats to be mainly scavengers, not hunters, feeding mostly on garbage and scraps. When they do hunt, cats prefer rodents and other burrowing animals.
Can you provide links to those studies?
What rubbish are you talking about?
Show us the scientific studies you are referring to?
Here’s one. But you know how to use Google too.
Pingback: Are You One in every of These Five Forms of Cat Owners? – Bafud
Pingback: 12 Misconceptions About Cats - Dog Grooming News for dogs groomers and pet owners
Pingback: 12 Misconceptions About Cats - Pet News 2Day
Pingback: 12 Misconceptions About Cats - Toadzz
Pingback: 12 Misconceptions About Cats – Mentalfloss – xvoli
I have lived in four different states and in each location I had to choose between vermin and cats.