Salmon aquaculture nets near Hitra, Norway. (Image credit: Peter Anthony Frank, NTNU, CC BY 2.0)
Tag Archives: ocean
Can you help ease the global biodiversity crisis through the choices you make at your local fish market? A recent report by US-based nonprofit Eating with the Ecosystem suggests that the answer is a resounding “Yes!”Read more
The red lionfish, an aggressive, fecund, and competitive species invasive to the Atlantic Ocean (Image Credit: Alexander Vasenin, CC BY-SA 3.0).
The genomics of invasion: characterization of red lionfish (Pterois volitans) populations from the native and introduced ranges (2019) Burford Reiskind et al., Biological Invasions, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01992-0(0123456789
Invasive species are one of the most destructive forces and largest threats to native ecosystems, second only to habitat loss. The “how” and “when” of a species invading new habitats is obviously important, and as such many studies focus on if invasive species are present and if they are spreading. Yet these studies often disregard the mechanisms behind why a species is spreading or succeeding in these new environments. The mechanisms are important here, because by and large most invasive organisms will have very small populations sizes, leaving them vulnerable to stochastic events like environmental flux, disease, and inbreeding depression.
Two key paradoxes of invasive species are that these small groups of invasive organisms tend to not only have more genetic diversity than the native species (making them more adaptable to environmental change), but they are also able to outcompete the native organisms, despite having evolved in and adapted to what may be a completely different environment. The authors of this study used genomic approaches to address and try to understand these paradoxes. Read more
Miscommunication concerning ecosystems like the Great Barrier Reef can be extremely harmful to their future. I recently encountered a frustrating example of such misinformation. (Image Credit: Workfortravel, CC BY-SA 4.0)
Scientific communication is at the forefront of what we do here at Ecology for the Masses. We like to celebrate good examples of SciComm whenever we can. But every now and then it’s misused so overtly that you have to talk about it. So today I want to share a recent example of scientific communication that confused and worried me.
As a fish ecologist living in Norway, it’s a joy to be able to travel to Melbourne and interact with the people that are driving forward fish science in my home country. So when I found out that the Australian Society of Fish Biology’s annual conference was taking place 3 days after my first flight home since 2016, I knew it was an opportunity I couldn’t pass up.
We’re on the last day of the conference at the moment, and over the next 2 months I’m looking forward to bringing you a number of insights, including interviews with guest speakers Eva Plaganyi and Gretta Pecl and pioneers of intriguing projects like Peter Unmack and Jarod Lyon. I’ll also have a fish edition of The Changing Face of Ecology, and some articles on how the angling community and the fish science community interact in a country with one of the most unique fish assemblages in the world.
Species richness is much higher in waters near the equator, but do we see that in a phylogenetic tree? (Image Credit: Rich Brooks, CC BY 2.0)
An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes (2018) Rabosky et al., Nature doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0273-1
The tropical regions of the Earth are the most species-rich and diverse ecosystems on the planet, with this diversity and species-richness declining as you move further and further from the equator. One hypothesis explaining this is that speciation rates are simply higher in the tropics, meaning that more species are evolving in a given time in the tropics than anywhere else. To test for this, the authors used the largest phylogenetic tree available and analyzed speciation rates (how many new species evolve from older species) per million years.
“… a red army of monster crustaceans – marshaled by Soviet-era leaders – is threatening to invade Western Europe …”
– James Owen, National Geographic, 2004
Ominous. That’s the thing, isn’t it. Some invasive species look harmless. You can’t be scared of a baby Canada Goose, can you? Or a nice purple garden flower. Such florescence. You can, however, be scared of a spiny, alien-looking 10 kilo mass of spines and pincers that has been shuffling its way into Norwegian waters over the last half-century.
What are they?
Paralithodes camtschaticus, the Red King Crab, is the most heavily fished crustacean in Russian seas. They fetch a high price at the market, and over 50 million USD was made in exports in Norway alone in 2016. A common trait amongst invasive species, they are a generalist predator, and will eat anything, from small invertebrates to large echinoderms and bivalves. They are among the largest arthropods living, with 8 legs, 2 pincers, a carapace of around 22cm, and an unholy mass of mandibles and spines to go with it. They are also quick movers, and can relocate based on available food quickly. Basically, if I were a sea urchin, were it not for the sea urchin’s general lack of the concept of fear or any other emotion, I’d be terrified.
How did they get here?
The crab is native to the northern Pacific Ocean, but like the Pink Salmon, they were deliberately stocked into the Murman coast by Russian scientists for commercial fishery. Since the 60s the crab has spread into Norwegian waters, and was well established in Northern Norway by the 90s. Soon after this the population skyrocketed, and the majority of fjords in Northern Norway are now occupied by the crab. Whilst the crabs prefer colder temperatures, increased temperature doesn’t seem to be a barrier for migration, and the fact that there are also reports of human introductions as far south as Bergen should be worrying.
What do they do?
Their role as a large predator of pretty much anything, combined with the fact that they migrate between different depths and are fast movers, mean that they can significantly change the physical structure of the ecosystem that they inhabit very quickly. Their removal of larger bivalves and echinoderms has lead to lower diversity and abundance in Norwegian fjords, particularly among species with low motility, and subsequent changes in the entire community composition of an ecosystem. They can also contribute to a loss in production and nutrient recycling, and subsequent drops in populations of local fish.
How do we stop them?
This is difficult, and marks the point in this series where we need to actually consider the term ‘invasive’. So far, I’ve considered invasive species as alien species which demonstrate a negative effect for the ecosystems they are novel to, or on the economy of a nation, with no pronounced positive effects in any other aspect. However in many international and national laws, invasive species are those which have a negative impact on human health or economy. And here lies the issue. Whilst the Red King Crab has an undeniably negative effect of local biodiversity, it has a undeniably positive effect on the Norwegian economy.
I’ll return to this topic next week, but for now let’s approach the issue as if we want to stop the incursion. The crabs seem to display high site loyalty, which means that they’re theoretically easy to prevent from spreading further down the Norwegian coast, given correct management.
The crabs prefer cold waters so let’s keep that climate change going and drive them out of Norway oh dear God my apologies that’s a terrible idea.
Reducing supply-and-demand lessens the crab’s economic value, so avoiding crab meat is a good step. Yet the Norwegian government’s tactics here are more likely to make a difference. Currently the practice is to maintain a certain capacity in some areas, whilst aiming for fishing to eradication in areas further south to prevent spreading. However there is little incentive for fishermen to eradicate a substantial part of their livelihood, so these regulations may need to be more strictly enforced, or the quota regulated areas restricted further.
For more information on the crab, we invite you to read the following articles.
Giant Crab ‘Red Army’ Invades Norway by James Owen for National Geographic News
Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet –Paralithodes camtschaticus by the Online Database of the North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species
Current Status of the Red King Crab and Snow Crab Industries in Norway by Lorentzen et al.
Thermal behaviour and the prospect spread of an invasive benthic top predator by Christiansen et al.